Skip to main content
TXPTenXPros
Back to AI Role X-Ray

Policy v1.0 · Effective 22 August 2026

AI Role X-Ray editorial and use policy

This policy defines what we publish, how we separate evidence from interpretation and what no reader or employer should deploy without independent validation.

This is a product and editorial risk-control policy, not a legal opinion or a claim of compliance in any jurisdiction. Naprolity OÜ operates TenXPros. A qualified lawyer should review live hiring, data and publication practices for each target market.

Three formats, never blurred

Full Edition may identify an employer because the employer and role are the subject of a dated public source. It may include a Public-JD Evidence Score and a clearly labelled editorial scenario.

Real-job source brief identifies a dated public role, paraphrases only limited observed signals and separates them from a TenX role hypothesis. It is unscored, links readers to the source and is not represented as a full Edition or an employer practice.

Illustrative role example is authored by TenX, names no employer, uses no vacancy, carries no evidence score and is not represented as a factual finding. These examples may explain the method elsewhere on the site, but do not enter the real-job Hub catalogue.

Planned topics are not counted as published, do not receive detail pages and do not enter Article structured data or the sitemap.

Source acquisition and provenance

We prefer an employer's careers page or its authorized applicant-tracking system. Platform postings are a secondary acquisition route and are not called official unless that status is verified.

No unauthorised scraping, access-control bypass or full job-description republication is allowed. A new published edition requires a private source record with URL, capture timestamp, access method, rights basis, SHA-256 hash, source locators, reviewer and an approved, reviewed retention status.

A source brief is manually curated from a public employer, ATS or clearly identified platform page. It publishes minimal identifying facts, a limited paraphrase and the source link; it does not publish a copy, screenshot or hidden archive of the job description. The card shows when the source was checked and does not promise that the vacancy remains open.

Outbound source links use direct HTTPS locators without TenX campaign tracking. Employer and authorized ATS sources are preferred; a platform source is labelled as such and is not described as official unless verified.

A legacy record that lacks an exact timestamp, hash or completed retention determination must say so explicitly and cannot be presented as satisfying the new-publication standard.

The public article paraphrases facts and uses only limited source wording when necessary for criticism, review or verification. No employer logo, screenshot, photograph, wordmark treatment or trade dress is used.

Claims, dates and corrections

Material statements must be labelled as Fact, Observation, Inference, TenX Scenario, Forecast or Recommendation. Facts and observations are limited to what was visible in the reviewed source as of its stated date. Not visible never means absent from the employer.

On a source brief, “Observed public-JD signal” describes only the source text; “TenX role hypothesis” is our interpretation, not a title, plan or claim supplied by the employer.

Forecasts are TenX editorial scenarios, not employer plans or promises. Source completeness, assessment reliability and forecast confidence are separate concepts.

Verified factual errors are corrected in place with a dated note. Materially unsupported content may be restricted or withdrawn while the durable URL explains the status.

Score and comparison boundary

The Public-JD Evidence Score evaluates one captured document against the versioned TenX rubric. It does not rate the employer, its people, internal AI maturity, legal compliance or actual hiring process.

Unless an edition says otherwise, scoring is single-assessor editorial coding with no inter-rater reliability study and no published reference distribution. A score has no percentile meaning.

We do not sort named employers by score, publish league tables or combine Full Edition scores with source briefs or illustrative examples.

Trademark and non-affiliation

An employer or platform name is used in plain text only when reasonably necessary to identify the subject and source. It must not imply sponsorship, partnership, recruitment authority, certification or endorsement.

The non-affiliation notice appears near the first employer and score presentation, in social preview artwork and in the scope notice. Commercial engagement cannot buy a change to a substantiated conclusion.

An employer may provide context or a response for editorial consideration. That does not create a client, auditor or employment relationship.

Not ready for live hiring

Role blueprints, work samples, questions and rubrics are illustrative editorial design patterns. They are not validated selection procedures, automated decision systems or legal advice.

Before live use, an employer must complete its own job analysis, criterion validation, reliability and adverse-impact testing, accessibility and accommodation design, privacy and security review, required notices, appeal or contestability path, trained human review, retention controls and jurisdiction-specific legal review.

Emotion recognition, face or voice inference, protected-trait inference, covert personality inference and secret fully automated candidate ranking are outside the design. Assistive technology and agreed accommodation are never treated as prohibited AI use.

Candidate data and work samples

Examples use synthetic cases and synthetic or authorised data. Candidates should never submit confidential employer, customer, patient, privileged or regulated information.

Any live assessment should provide substantively equivalent access subject to reasonable adjustments, disclose material AI-use rules in advance and evaluate job-related evidence rather than access to a personally paid model.

Candidate work must not become free consulting or operational output. Employers need a clear deletion schedule, use restriction and compensation review where burden becomes substantial.

Privacy and accessibility

Published X-Ray content should not include candidate data, recruiter contact details or sensitive personal data. Corrections should include only the minimum necessary source reference and no confidential attachment.

WCAG 2.2 AA is the release target. Keyboard access, visible focus, screen-reader behavior, zoom and reflow, contrast, reduced motion and table alternatives require automated and manual review.

Operational and analytics data practices are governed separately by the TenXPros Privacy Policy. Pseudonymous telemetry is not described as anonymous.

Official guardrail references

These sources inform the controls above. Listing them is not a certification or a claim that a generic pattern satisfies any specific law.

Corrections, rights or accessibility issue? Email support@tenxpros.com. Include the page URL and a concise description. Do not send confidential personal or company documents by email.